Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
en:safeav:ctrl:testing [2026/06/03 00:17] – [Test Tracks and Physical Testing] momalaen:safeav:ctrl:testing [2026/06/03 00:23] (current) – [Test Methods] momala
Line 5: Line 5:
 The central idea is that the scenario from the previous subsection must be brought into a test environment that is suitable for the question being asked. A lane-change scenario, for example, may first be explored in CARLA or another simulator, then repeated with software-in-the-loop or hardware-in-the-loop components, then confirmed at a controlled proving ground such as ZalaZONE, and finally monitored in limited real-world operation. In each case, the test method changes, but the underlying scenario remains the same. That is what makes the validation evidence comparable. The central idea is that the scenario from the previous subsection must be brought into a test environment that is suitable for the question being asked. A lane-change scenario, for example, may first be explored in CARLA or another simulator, then repeated with software-in-the-loop or hardware-in-the-loop components, then confirmed at a controlled proving ground such as ZalaZONE, and finally monitored in limited real-world operation. In each case, the test method changes, but the underlying scenario remains the same. That is what makes the validation evidence comparable.
  
-<!-- Figure comment: testing ladder from simulation to SiL/HiL to test track to real-world testing -->+{{ :en:safeav:ctrl:testing_methods.png?600 |Three main testing methods}} 
  
 ===== Simulation-Based Testing ===== ===== Simulation-Based Testing =====
en/safeav/ctrl/testing.txt · Last modified: by momala
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0