Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:safeav:softsys:vaicomp [2025/09/18 14:22] – ToDo checked: raivo.sellen:safeav:softsys:vaicomp [2026/04/07 10:00] (current) raivo.sell
Line 30: Line 30:
 Overall, it is a very ambitious endeavor and there are significant challenges to building this specification of a reasonable driver. First, the idea of a “reasonable” driver is not even well encoded on the human side. Rather, this definition of “reasonableness” is built over a long history of legal distillation, and of course, the human standard is built on the understanding of humans by other humans.  Second, the complexity of such a standard would be very high and it is not clear if it is doable.  Finally, it may take quite a while of legal distillation to reach some level of closure on a human like an “AI-Driver.” Overall, it is a very ambitious endeavor and there are significant challenges to building this specification of a reasonable driver. First, the idea of a “reasonable” driver is not even well encoded on the human side. Rather, this definition of “reasonableness” is built over a long history of legal distillation, and of course, the human standard is built on the understanding of humans by other humans.  Second, the complexity of such a standard would be very high and it is not clear if it is doable.  Finally, it may take quite a while of legal distillation to reach some level of closure on a human like an “AI-Driver.”
 Currently, the state-of-art for specification is relatively poor for both ADAS and AV. ADAS systems, which are widely proliferated, have massive divergences in behavior and completeness. When a customer buys ADAS, it is not entirely clear what they are getting. Tests by industry groups such as AAA, consumer reports, and IIHS have shown the significant shortcomings of existing solutions [20]. In 2024, IIHS introduced a ratings program to evaluate the safeguards of partial driving automation systems. Out of 14 systems tested, only one received an acceptable rating, highlighting the need for improved measures to prevent misuse and ensure driver engagement [21]. Today, there is only one non process oriented regulation in the marketplace, and this is the NHTSA regulations around AEB [22]. Currently, the state-of-art for specification is relatively poor for both ADAS and AV. ADAS systems, which are widely proliferated, have massive divergences in behavior and completeness. When a customer buys ADAS, it is not entirely clear what they are getting. Tests by industry groups such as AAA, consumer reports, and IIHS have shown the significant shortcomings of existing solutions [20]. In 2024, IIHS introduced a ratings program to evaluate the safeguards of partial driving automation systems. Out of 14 systems tested, only one received an acceptable rating, highlighting the need for improved measures to prevent misuse and ensure driver engagement [21]. Today, there is only one non process oriented regulation in the marketplace, and this is the NHTSA regulations around AEB [22].
 +
 +
en/safeav/softsys/vaicomp.1758194521.txt.gz · Last modified: by raivo.sell
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0