This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| en:safeav:handson:intro [2026/04/29 14:46] – [Use Case #4 Drone] raivo.sell | en:safeav:handson:intro [2026/04/29 14:48] (current) – raivo.sell | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== | + | ====== |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Use-case requirements ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This chapter defines the minimum requirements for the use cases that will be developed, validated, and comparatively assessed within the SafeAV framework (AV shuttle, F1TENTH, mobile robot, UAV). The goal is to align learning outcomes with technical, safety, and regulatory constraints, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Conclusions and Decisions ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In conclusion, the consortium has evaluated the available verification and validation frameworks based on current research, technical feasibility, | + | |
| - | Use case No | + | |
| - | Name | + | |
| - | Description | + | |
| - | Selected Frameworks and Software Set | + | |
| - | Responsible partner | + | |
| - | #1 | + | |
| - | AV shuttle | + | |
| - | Simulation-based V&V use case for an autonomous shuttle used in education, prototyping, | + | |
| - | Autoware.Universe (software under test), | + | |
| - | AWSIM (digital twin, sensor simulation, Autoware integration), | + | |
| - | CARLA (high-fidelity perception & planning validation, synthetic data), | + | |
| - | Rosbag Replay (real-world perception regression), | + | |
| - | Scenario Simulator v2 (scenario-based planning validation), | + | |
| - | CommonRoad (planning benchmarking), | + | |
| - | SUMO (traffic co-simulation) | + | |
| - | Scenic (Scenario generator for CARLA) | + | |
| - | TalTech | + | |
| - | #2 | + | |
| - | F1Tenth | + | |
| - | The F1TENTH use case demonstrates the application of open-source V&V frameworks for validating autonomous driving functions on a 1/10-scale research platform. Verification focuses on trajectory tracking, ensuring that the vehicle follows safe and stable paths without collisions or oscillations when encountering static or dynamic obstacles. In addition, the setup supports perception-level validation, including object and traffic sign detection, persistence of observations, | + | |
| - | Rosbag Replay (real-world perception), | + | |
| - | F1TENTH Gym (simple 2D simulation) | + | |
| - | ROSMonitoring (verifying at runtime) | + | |
| - | RoboFuzz (testing with noisy inputs) | + | |
| - | CTU | + | |
| - | #3 | + | |
| - | Mobile robot | + | |
| - | The V&V framework for the cooperative indoor logistics robot system ensure that V&V are systematically applied across design, simulation, and real-world operation. Verification focuses on requirement traceability, | + | |
| - | Nav2 and MoveIt 2 (navigation and motion planning) | + | |
| - | Gazebo/ | + | |
| - | MQTT broker Eclipse Mosquitto for message exchange | + | |
| - | OpenCV and PCL vision and LIDAR processing | + | |
| - | ROS2 testing tools | + | |
| - | RTU | + | |
| - | #4 | + | |
| - | Drone | + | |
| - | Simulation-based verification and validation (V&V) for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is essential before executing real-world missions to ensure software correctness, | + | |
| - | AirSim (real-world perception) | + | |
| - | Gazeboo (open source simulator) | + | |
| - | ArduPilot, QGroundControl (primary framework) | + | |
| - | UAV Matlab/ | + | |
| - | CARLA (Unreal Engine based simulator) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Key Findings and Recommendations ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ROS-based frameworks thus form a critical part of the **SafeAV educational toolchain, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The selected frameworks fulfill higher-education requirements: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | - **Accessibility: | + | |
| - | - **Ease of setup:** Docker-based deployment for classroom or remote use. | + | |
| - | - **Pedagogical link:** supports blended learning (MOOCs + hands-on labs). | + | |
| - | - **Interdisciplinary use:** applicable in robotics, AI, safety engineering, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These outcomes directly contribute to WP3 educational digital content and WP2 modular curriculum design. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | 1. **Autoware.Universe** should be the baseline platform for SafeAV framework adaptation. | + | |
| - | 2. **AWSIM/ | + | |
| - | 3. **ROS-based verification tools** enable node-level and formal validation, aligning with ISO 26262 / SOTIF principles. | + | |
| - | 4. Partner use cases ensure coverage of ground, aerial, and hybrid autonomous systems for educational demonstration. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Next Steps → T4.2 Adaptation ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | - Containerize selected frameworks for student deployment. | + | |
| - | - Develop a hands-on educational guide linking WP3 digital content to WP4 V&V examples. | + | |
| - | - Integrate simulation exercises into the SafeAV MOOC platform. | + | |
| - | - Define data interfaces (ROS bag, OpenSCENARIO) for cross-use of materials. | + | |
| - | - Establish KPIs for student learning outcomes (practical validation success, reproducibility, | + | |
| - | + | ||