This is an old revision of the document!


Appendixes

Tables

Autonomous Systems

Domain Primary Standards Body Key Autonomy Standard
Ground SAE SAE J3016
Ground ISO ISO 26262, ISO 21448
Ground UNECE UN R157
Airborne RTCA DO-178C, DO-365
Airborne FAA/EASA UAV autonomy certification
Marine IMO MASS autonomy levels
Marine DNV Autonomous ship standards
Space NASA ALFUS autonomy framework
Space CCSDS Spacecraft autonomy protocols
Cross-domain IEEE IEEE 7000 series
Cross-domain IEC IEC 61508
Cross-domain NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Industries and Companies:

Type Description Example Players (Companies / Organizations)
Regulators & Government Agencies Define laws, certification pathways, and operational constraints for autonomous systems across domains (ground, air, marine, space). They translate legislation into enforceable rules and approvals. NHTSA, FAA, EASA, International Maritime Organization, NASA, ESA
Standards Organizations / Industry Consortia Develop technical standards, safety frameworks, and autonomy classification systems that regulators and industry rely on (e.g., SAE levels, ISO safety standards). SAE International, ISO, IEEE, RTCA, ASTM
Legal & Advisory Firms Interpret liability, compliance, and regulatory frameworks; support litigation, risk assessment, and policy strategy for autonomy deployments. Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper, Latham & Watkins
Certification & Testing Authorities Provide independent validation, certification audits, and compliance verification against safety standards (ASIL, DAL, etc.). Critical for market entry. TÜV SÜD, UL Solutions, DNV
Simulation & Digital Twin Software Providers Provide tools for scenario-based validation, digital twins, and V&V workflows across autonomy stacks (SIL/HIL, scenario generation, formal testing). NVIDIA (DRIVE Sim), MathWorks, Ansys, Siemens
Test Track & Physical Testing Infrastructure Providers Operate controlled environments for real-world validation (proving grounds, UAV corridors, maritime test ranges). Bridge sim-to-real validation. American Center for Mobility, MCity, FAA UAV Test Sites

Hardware and Sensing Technologies

Industries and Companies:

Type Description Example Players (Companies)
Semiconductor Manufacturers (Logic & Compute) Design and manufacture digital logic devices (MCUs, MPUs, SoCs, AI accelerators) that execute perception, planning, and control workloads in autonomous systems. Intel, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, NXP Semiconductors
Analog & Mixed-Signal Semiconductor Providers Provide sensing interfaces, power management ICs, ADC/DACs, and signal conditioning required to convert physical signals into digital data. Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, Infineon Technologies
Power Semiconductor & Wide Bandgap Players Develop Si, SiC, and GaN devices for high-efficiency power conversion in EVs, aircraft electrification, marine propulsion, and space systems. Wolfspeed, onsemi, STMicroelectronics
Sensor Manufacturers (Perception Hardware) Build core sensing modalities (camera, radar, LiDAR, IMU, GNSS, sonar, star trackers) that define system observability and autonomy limits. Bosch, Continental AG, Velodyne LiDAR, Teledyne Technologies
RF & Communication Chip / Module Providers Provide connectivity hardware (5G, V2X, satellite comms, radar front-ends) enabling communication and extended perception. Skyworks Solutions, Qorvo, Broadcom
FPGA & Reconfigurable Compute Vendors Supply programmable logic for deterministic, safety-critical and adaptable processing in aerospace, defense, and space systems. AMD, Intel
EDA (Electronic Design Automation) Companies Provide design, simulation, verification, and sign-off tools spanning chip, package, and PCB levels—critical for hardware validation and production. Synopsys, Cadence Design Systems, Siemens
Foundries & Advanced Packaging Providers Fabricate semiconductors and provide advanced packaging technologies for high-performance and reliable systems. TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel Foundry Services
Vendor Platform / Kit Type Key Components Target Domain Notes / Differentiation
NVIDIA NVIDIA DRIVE (Orin / Thor) Full autonomy compute platform GPU SoC, Tensor cores, CUDA, DriveWorks SDK Automotive autonomy (L2–L4) End-to-end AV compute + software stack
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Dev Kit Embedded AI compute platform CPU + GPU SoC, camera interfaces Robotics, drones, edge AI Widely used for prototyping
Qualcomm Snapdragon Ride Automotive compute platform AI accelerator, vision DSP, sensor fusion Automotive ADAS/AV Strong power efficiency + integration
Intel Mobileye EyeQ / AV platform Vision-centric ADAS platform Vision SoC, camera-based perception software Automotive ADAS Camera-first autonomy strategy
AMD Versal Adaptive SoCs FPGA/ACAP compute platform FPGA fabric + AI engines Automotive, aerospace Deterministic + adaptive compute
Texas Instruments TDA4VM / Jacinto ADAS processor Vision DSP, radar processing, safety MCUs Automotive Strong functional safety (ISO 26262 focus)
NXP Semiconductors S32V / BlueBox Automotive compute + networking Vision SoC, radar processing, CAN/FlexRay Automotive Strong vehicle networking integration
Bosch Radar / ADAS platforms Sensor + ECU systems Radar, camera, ECU modules Automotive Tier-1 integrated sensor + compute solutions
Continental AG Continental ADAS Dev Platform Sensor fusion system Radar, LiDAR, camera modules Automotive Strong system-level integration
Velodyne LiDAR LiDAR Dev Kits (e.g., Puck) Sensor dev kits 3D LiDAR + SDK Autonomous, robotics High-resolution 3D perception
Ouster Ouster OS1 / Gemini LiDAR platform Digital LiDAR + API Robotics, industrial Software-defined LiDAR stack
Analog Devices Radar Development Kits RF sensing platform RF front-end + DSP Automotive, industrial Strong RF + signal chain expertise
Infineon Technologies AURIX + Radar Kits Safety MCU + radar Radar IC + safety MCU Automotive Leading safety MCU platform
STMicroelectronics STM32 + Sensor Kits Embedded sensing platform MCU + IMU, GNSS, camera Robotics, IoT Low-cost prototyping ecosystem
Teledyne Technologies Imaging Sensor Kits Vision sensing CMOS sensors, thermal imaging Aerospace, defense High-performance imaging
Sony CMOS Image Sensors Vision sensors High dynamic range sensors Automotive, consumer Dominant in camera sensing
Hexagon Autonomous Sensors Software + sensors LiDAR + mapping + analytics Industrial autonomy Strong digital twin ecosystem
dSPACE HIL (Hardware-in-the-Loop) systems Validation platform Sensor models, ECU integration Automotive, aerospace Critical for V&V workflows

Industrial Use Case #1

Industrial Use Case #2

Industrial Use Case #3: Verification and Validation of a UAV

This use case outlines the step-by-step validation methodology implemented by Partner to safely transition a autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle from an initial prototype to a market-ready, certified product (TRL 9).

Phase 1: Operational Design Domain (ODD) & Safety Requirements Definition

Transitioning a UAV starts with defining a strict ODD. This includes environmental boundaries, such as operating temperatures ranging from -30°C to +40°C and wind resistance up to 14-15 m/s. Furthermore, the safety goals must account for severe operational constraints, such as flights in GNSS-denied environments and resilience against active electronic warfare (spoofing and jamming).

Phase 2: Simulation-Based V&V (Software-in-the-Loop & Formal Methods)

Before physical deployment, the autonomy software stack undergoes rigorous Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) validation. Utilizing proprietary simulation environments, developers test critical algorithms for object tracking, scene understanding, and GNSS-denied navigation (such as optical flow and dead reckoning). Simulating edge cases like sudden communication loss or sensor blinding ensures that the autonomous decision-making algorithms remain predictable and safe without risking physical hardware.

Phase 3: Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) and Sensor Integration

Once the software matures, it is integrated with the actual avionics framework. The validation bench assesses the performance of multi-sensor payloads (e.g., hybrid 30x zoom RGB cameras, high-sensitivity thermal sensors, and laser rangefinders). Simultaneously, the proprietary Ground Control Station (GCS) and digital communication modules are tested under simulated Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) to verify the robustness and for datalinks encryption (e.g., AES-256). HIL testing ensures that the onboard edge computing can process real-time routines without processing latency.

Phase 4: Physical Scenario-Based Testing

The UAV is subjected to controlled, real-world physical testing on dedicated proving grounds. Field trials validate complex autonomous behaviors such as autonomus functions, and automatic Return-to-Launch (RTL) dynamically adjusted by real-time wind estimation. Physical stress tests also confirm mechanical reliability and environmental sealing, verifying IP55 compliance and, where applicable, water-landing and take-off capabilities.

Phase 5: Safety Argumentation, Certification, and Customer Delivery

The final phase aggregates all V&V data into a comprehensive safety case. The system undergoes independent compliance audits against stringent industry and military standards. Upon reaching Technology Readiness Level 9 (TRL 9), the system is deployed to the customer. The delivery includes not just the physical hardware, but also comprehensive, module-based operator training (e.g., automated mission scenarios and tactical piloting) to ensure safe operational handover and a thorough understanding of the autonomy boundaries.

en/safeav/appendixes.1781083822.txt.gz · Last modified: by tom
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0