en:safeav:curriculum:maps-m
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| en:safeav:curriculum:maps-m [2025/10/21 11:33] – [Table] larisas | en:safeav:curriculum:maps-m [2025/11/05 11:17] (current) – airi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Module: Perception, Mapping, and Localization (Part 2) ====== | ====== Module: Perception, Mapping, and Localization (Part 2) ====== | ||
| - | | **Study level** | + | |
| - | | **ECTS credits** | + | ^ **Study level** | Master | |
| - | | **Study forms** | + | ^ **ECTS credits** | 1 ECTS | |
| - | | **Module aims** | + | ^ **Study forms** | Hybrid or fully online | |
| - | | **Pre-requirements** | + | ^ **Module aims** | The aim of the module is to introduce |
| - | | **Learning outcomes** | + | ^ **Pre-requirements** | Basic knowledge of probability |
| - | | ** Topics ** | 1. Sources of Instability and Uncertainty: | + | ^ **Learning outcomes** | **Knowledge**\\ • Distinguish between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty and describe their impact on perception and mapping.\\ • Explain sources of instability such as sensor noise, occlusions, quantization, |
| - | | **Type of assessment** | + | ^ **Topics** | 1. Sources of Instability and Uncertainty: |
| - | | **Learning methods** | + | ^ **Type of assessment** | The prerequisite of a positive grade is a positive evaluation of module topics and presentation of practical work results with required documentation. | |
| - | | **AI involvement** | + | ^ **Learning methods** | **Lecture** — Explore theoretical principles of uncertainty, |
| - | | **References to\\ literature** | 1. Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2005). Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press.\\ 2. Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision? NeurIPS.\\ 3. Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples. ICLR.\\ 4. ISO 21448 (2022). Road Vehicles – Safety Of The Intended Functionality (SOTIF).\\ 5. ISO 26262 (2018). Road Vehicles – Functional Safety.\\ 6. Cadena, C., et al. (2016). Past, Present, and Future of SLAM. IEEE Transactions on Robotics.\\ 7. Zhang, J., & Singh, S. (2017). LOAM: Lidar Odometry and Mapping in Real-time. RSS.\\ 8. Razdan, R., & Sell, R. (2025). Uncertainty-Aware Perception and Mapping Frameworks for Autonomous Systems. IEEE Access (forthcoming). | + | ^ **AI involvement** | AI tools may assist in simulating uncertainty propagation, |
| - | | **Lab equipment** | Yes || | + | ^ **Recommended tools and environments** | ROS2, MATLAB, KITTI, NuScenes, Waymo | |
| - | | **Virtual lab** | + | ^ **Verification and Validation focus** | | |
| - | | **MOOC course** | + | ^ **Relevant standards and regulatory frameworks** | ISO 26262, ISO 21448 (SOTIF) | |
en/safeav/curriculum/maps-m.1761035636.txt.gz · Last modified: by larisas
